Gives three reasons why Dispensationalism is the best way to view scripture.

In this online forum, the merits of Dispensational Theology are discussed by dispensationalists and non-dispensationalists alike.

Understanding the eschatological views of the early church fathers is imperative, because one frequent charge against dispensational premillennialists is that this system cannot pass the test of historical theology.

Covenant Theology and Dispensationalism are different theological systems developed to explain how God deals with man in salvation, and the role of Israel and the Church in God's plan of salvation.

This Traditional Dispensationalist questions the doubtful teaching that Acts 2:38 demands baptism for salvation, as well as the Ultra-Dispensational view that it applied only to Israel.

Brief annotations on the books of the Bible by Arno Gaebelein, a champion of traditional dispensational theology.

Tracing dispensationalism from beliefs held by Early Dispensationalists (called EDs) through those held by Recent Dispensationalists (RDs), this paper highlights changes that have allowed the recent development of PD.

In general, the premillennialist will be Dispensational in theology, and interpret scripture more literally than the Amillennialist, who may be a Covenant Theologian, with an allegorical interpretation of scripture.

This study exposes the errors of preterist Gary DeMar's book titled "Last Days Madness."

One argument against dispensationalism is the claim that because nobody could keep the law, salvation has always been through Christ; however, this argument is easily proven false by scripture.

The controversy over whether or not the body of Christ can be found in Matthew 24 is further compounded by all the different dispensational viewpoints.

Christianity also has four seasons, with winter characterized by excessive unscriptural teachings, such as one church's recent endorsement of Eastern religions; and springtime characterized by the recovery of Dispensational truth.

Dispensationalists view the mystery of Gods will in Ephesians 1:9-10 differently from Covenant Theologians and Progressive Dispensationalists, neither of which maintain a strict distinction between Israel and the Church.

Some writers have believed in different administrations ever since the first century; consequently, failure to understand the true teaching of dispensationalism has led many to make false applications of scripture.

Dr. Ken Johnson looks at the Dispensational beliefs held by early church fathers such as Irenaeus (177 AD), Clement of Alexandria (192 AD), Tertullian (210 AD), and Origen (230 AD).

Some critics wrongly label Dispensationalists as extremists and misrepresent them with outright lies, such as the false claim that Pat Robertson (a post-millennialist) is actually a Dispensationalist.

Many false doctrines are based on passages taken out of context from the New Testament books of Matthew and Acts, and only a dispensational view will disprove them.

This chart depicts a Traditional viewpoint of Dispensationalism, in which this present dispensation exists from the Cross to the Rapture.

Rightly Dividing, as in 2 Timothy 2:15, explains apparent contradictions in scripture, such as why the angel in Rev. 14:6-7 is not under the curse of Galatians 1:8-9.

Baptisms of the Bible can be classified as being either Wet or Dry; Real or Symbolic; Unique or Common; and this paper looks at them all, from a Dispensational viewpoint.