Is earth's moon an artificial satellite? Discussion Forum: General Paranormal Discussions: Is earth's moon an artificial satellite?
By TS on Tuesday, March 21, 2000 - 05:13 pm:

Why hasn't NASA sent anymore expeditions to the moon? Is it because it's allegedly occupied by beings from elsewhere in the universe? According to transcripts, now censored, there were animated conversations between various astronauts,who now deny such events occurred,had seen and encountered
extraordinary objects(immense ufos and artificial structures). "They told us not to come back." This was allegedly stated by NASA as the reason why they no longer explore the moon. There is a lot more to this than is being told.

By Nathus on Friday, June 30, 2000 - 09:18 pm:

How did you hear about this? Do you have any website links, or know of any books about it?

By Paraseek Webmaster (Admin) on Wednesday, December 13, 2000 - 06:11 pm:

All I've heard dealing with the moon is that supposedly some of our men might have seen some craft on the moon during their landings. However, may have been an optical illusion, who knows.

I think we haven't gone back because there is no reason to at this time, but its clear NASA is investigating it as a base of operations for future work.

By Kenobe on Thursday, April 19, 2001 - 04:00 pm:

Check out a link on my site of John Glenn talking about those "glory days". the truth will eventually come out.
go to my site and find the VIDEO button

By Gavin christian. on Monday, June 18, 2001 - 10:34 am:

neil armstrong (and other astronauts)saw a Cigar shaped object flaoting near the moon.

By Mike E. on Wednesday, July 25, 2001 - 08:19 am:

Neil Armstrong really saw two tiny robots that were built almost like ants. He says they scurried away when he came too close. NASA says there was a sudden fluctuation of CO2 in his helmet and he had a temporary hallucination. Also,if the moon was an artificial satelite,WHEN THE HECK WOULD U HAVE LAUNCHED IT? We all know that it COULD NOT have been launched before the Moon expedition. And maybe it's because it costs a TON to send a couple of guys to the Moon? Or maybe because the Moon has a toy mentality to NASA:we played with it,now let's get a new toy.

By Dustin56 on Friday, March 15, 2002 - 03:37 pm:

i think there was no moon expidition becuz i watched this show where it showed footage and all the shadows were criss crossed in diff directions and there was wind and the moon has no atmosphere.

By Dave on Saturday, April 20, 2002 - 09:18 pm:

There was an interesting show on Space channel in 2001, that showed some very convincing evidence the moon landing was staged, and all of it was filmed in a studio.There is some interesting facts, such as for the spacecraft and it's occupants to survive radiation outside the earth's atmosphere, you would need something like six feet of lead shielding.Problem is, I forgot the name, and when it aired.

By Devshb on Sunday, April 28, 2002 - 11:56 am:

the various "arguments" for the moon landings being a conspiracy/fake have all been satisfactorily debunked in full.

Astronauts have, however, still seen/experienced a lot of weird things in space which haven't been explained.

One thing that has been explained is a series of minute streaks of bright lights/flashes. Astronauts often see something that looks very similar to a shooting star, but it appears to be small and very nearby or actually inside the shuttle/craft.

I think this is caused by cosmic rays (tiny particles from the sun ?) which are usually shielded from us by the earth's atmosphere, but which in space travel freely. They go straight through your body, and some of them by chance go through your retina and its tracks on the retina register in the brain as a very bright thin streak of light.

I believe that several astronauts didn't report these initially due to possible reactions, but following the increase of knowledge in particle physics, they've now described them in full.

It's these kind of particles that could cause major long-term damage (eg cancers?) on long (eg mars) missions.

By Dave on Saturday, August 24, 2002 - 05:44 pm:

I also believe that cosmic rays have something to do about it. The earths atmosphere protects live from it but in space we ar not protected. I think rays from sun etc. are so strong that they might create optic illusions. I am certain of it that one trip to space for several hours can cause cancer or other deseases! Still that story about fake or not... don' t have a theory for that. There must be an explanation but NASA act strange when they are confrontated with questions about that topic. They are hiding something for sure!!

By EAC on Thursday, November 7, 2002 - 09:35 pm:

The question you should be asking is... why is that the Soviet stop midway in their moon landing project?

Budget problems? No way! In the 1960's the Soviet's space program has way more resources than NASA.

Technical problems? But surely that can be resolved, even if the N-1's first stage boosters keep exploding, they could always try to revise its design or even design an alternate rocket designs. Or perharps those booster were working perfectly and there's another factor involved in their destruction?

Problem with internal politics in the space program? But surely someone in charge will want to send someone to the moon, over three decades is too long, someone should have already steeped in and said, "we will send someone there!"

There's just too many weird things in the space programs in both countries space programs.

Too many weird things that are left unexplained.

By Ambrosios Galileo on Thursday, November 28, 2002 - 01:40 am:

the fucking americans couldnt stand the idea of the russians getting there first so they made a film on it. 90% chance. besides its too expensive and risky. but then again if those lazy ass scientists got off their chairs and developed a new form of space engine than the fucking shitty rocket engine i think we woul dbe there in 2 hours, instead it takes about 4 days. i know im developing that shit.

By Khaku on Thursday, July 31, 2003 - 12:55 pm:

The moon landing was real.

The question: Why haven't we ever returned again, IS a very good one though...And a very mysterious one.

We have learned now that there is WATER! on the moon(You can search for those reports on any big news site)...This is a HUGE incentive to return...Yet we don't...Very strange.

By Pablo on Wednesday, August 6, 2003 - 01:34 am:

eh the fucking americans this, and the lazy ass scientists that, shove it dude, and come up with something yourself, when you invent it i'll kiss your ass but untill then GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!

By Mom on Thursday, October 9, 2003 - 02:20 pm:

The Moon is so barren it is a waste of our time to go back and money.Our money is better spent with the unmanned Voyager programs.Oh and be sure not to click on to Kenobe's link it's a trick.

By Evothek9 on Friday, October 10, 2003 - 01:49 am:

The moon is unlikely to be an artificial satalite. Who would have made it and why? honestly if something can travel billions of miles through space they're not gonna make a little rest stop on the edge of a reasonably uninteresting ball of mostely water.

As to why we're not going back to the moon now? well its a matter of ratings.. really. when America first went to the moon they had amazing ratings, everyone was interested, the world got a lot smaller and we all remember that world famous flubbed quote. But people started to loose interest. Yes as Mike E said, it's become an old toy. It's not worth the amount of money we'd have to spend to get people there.

We'd rather have a space station.. many reasons for that, the best is that a space station makes a better launch point for interplanetary expeditions and research. Why? because the moon has gravity weak as it is. costs more gas to get going.

This is the first step in an extremely long process to develop interplanetary transport. the top of the ladder as it is.. TRansport the stuff up there, eventually build a big elevator to the ground. (yes it is possible) and then travel in space becomes cheaper and much more feasable. However we're not to that stage yet.

By Evothek9 on Friday, October 10, 2003 - 01:50 am:

oh and the moon landing was not faked.

By Tommy Vercetti on Wednesday, May 5, 2004 - 01:19 pm:

Aliens on the moon!? Maybe it's true, maybe they use the moon as a sort of basecamp for visiting earth or maybe it's just total crap,but who knows, I'm open to any theory about the moon.

Add a Message

This is a public posting area. If you do not have an account, enter your full name into the "Username" box and leave the "Password" box empty. Your e-mail address is optional.
Post as "Anonymous"