Today there is a growing movement within dispensational theology that is gaining influence among some leading dispensational seminaries and churches across the land, called 'Progressive Dispensationalism'.

Stephen J. Nichols explains why Progressive Dispensationalism may not fit into the category of "true" Dispensationalism, because it fails to consistently distinguish between Israel and the Church.

Progressive Dispensationalism considers modern Israel to be the work of man, and not of God.

P.D. is not "Replacement Theology"; rather, it is better described as "Fulfillment Theology", portraying all redeemed people as a blessing which was promised as part of the New Covenant.

This Paper has to do with the distinction between Pauline and Progressive Dispensationalism, including the distinction between Israel and the Church.

This study examines the assumption made by the Progressive Dispensationalists that the Body of Christ partakes of the New Covenant promised to the houses of Israel and Judah.

The hermeneutical issues in dispensationalism's understanding of the Abrahamic covenant revolve around what Ryrie has termed "the sine qua non of Dispensationalism".